0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç °£È£»çµéÀÇ ¼Õ ¼Òµ¶Á¦¿¡ µû¸¥ ¼Òµ¶È¿°ú ¹× MRSA ºÐ¸®

The Effect of Disinfection and the MRSA Isolation from Hand Disinfectant in ICU Nurses

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 13±Ç 3È£ p.359 ~ 367
KMID : 0388320060130030359
¹Ú¼±³² ( Park Sun-Nam ) - ¼­¿ï¿©ÀÚ°£È£´ëÇÐ

·ù°æÈ­ ( Rhyu Kyung-Hwa ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º¹Ù¿À·Îº´¿ø
Á¤Á¤ÀÓ ( Jeong Jeong-Im ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼º¹Ù¿À·Îº´¿ø ¿Ü°úÁßȯÀÚ½Ç
¹Ú¿Á¼ø ( Park Ok-Soon ) - ¼­¿ï¿©ÀÚ°£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was a within subject repeated pretest-posttest design done to compare the effect of disinfection and the degree of MRSA(Methicillin- resistant staphylococcus aureus) isolation from hand disinfectant in ICU nurses.

Materials and Methods: Out of the total internal medicine/surgery ICU nurses at a university hospital in Seoul, 29 female nurses who were participating in direct patient care were participants in this study. After collection of samples, Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA were isolated from the palms, nails and nasal cavities of the nurses according to disinfectants (soap and beta-scrub).

Results: The effect of disinfection was greater in the beta-scrub group than in the soap group, and the effect of disinfection on palms was higher in the beta-scrub group than in the soap group. As for the degree of MRSA isolation, there was more isolation in palms in the soap group than in the beta-scrub group but there was no difference in the degree of MRSA isolation from the hand disinfectant in nails and nasal cavities.

Conclusion: Beta-scrub showed a superior prolonged effect against transient bacteria compared with soap. Further, to reduce MRSA infection, we recommend interventions focused on these aspects.
KeyWords
¼Õ¼Òµ¶Á¦, ¼Òµ¶È¿°ú, Æ÷µµ»ó±¸±Õ
Disinfectant, Disinfection, Staphylococcus aureus
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed